What actually differs between the three Microsoft agreements, which one fits which estate, and why the decision is about quantity rather than discount.
EA, CSP and MCA-E are three ways to buy the same Microsoft licences. The Enterprise Agreement binds a quantity for three years in exchange for price stability; CSP trades some unit price for the ability to change seat counts at term boundaries; MCA-E buys cloud directly from Microsoft with operational flexibility but little negotiable. Microsoft has raised the seat threshold for the EA and removed volume discount tiers on Online Services, which is why organisations that never questioned their agreement are now choosing between the other two.
Updated
Not a feature matrix — the dimensions where the choice actually shows up on an invoice.
| Dimension | EA | MCA-E | CSP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who you buy from | Microsoft, via a licensing partner | Microsoft, directly | A CSP partner |
| Term | Three years, fixed | Rolling, cloud-first | Monthly, annual or three-year |
| Reducing seats mid-term | Not until renewal | Depends on the term chosen | Only within seven days of a purchase, renewal or addition |
| Price protection | Historically the main reason to sign one | Little to none across terms | Within the chosen term |
| Who supports you | Microsoft, support purchased separately | Microsoft, self-service by default | Your partner, first line |
| Room to negotiate | Real, at renewal, with volume | Very limited; largely standard terms | Through the partner, on service and terms |
Large, stable seat counts that clear the current minimum, a hybrid estate with meaningful Software Assurance value, and enough volume that a renewal negotiation is a real negotiation rather than a form.
A headcount that moves, a preference for one partner who handles licensing and optimisation together, and a willingness to plan around the seven-day window rather than pretend it does not exist.
A cloud-only estate, an organisation comfortable transacting directly with Microsoft, and no expectation of negotiated terms or long price protection. Operationally light, commercially rigid.
The comparison that decides it is not unit price. It is how many seats you would remove if the agreement let you. An estate with a clean licence position can pick the cheaper instrument on the merits; an estate without one ends up negotiating a discount on a quantity nobody has verified — and a discount on seats you do not need is not a saving.
We build the licence position first, then the agreement comparison means something.